1. Secure, transferable rights + digital cadastre → unlocks credit, long-horizon investment, and reduces disputes. Systematic reviews generally find positive effects on investment/incomes, though not in every setting.
  2. Active land rental/sales markets & consolidation → larger operated farm sizes raise TFP; anti-fragmentation and easy leasing matter more than blunt ceilings. Quantitative work shows mis-designed reforms can lower productivity by shrinking average farm size.
  3. Tenancy security (e.g., sharecropper rights) → linked to lower poverty in India-style reforms; Pakistani studies also tie contract structure to investment behavior.
  4. Water rights & irrigation governance → critical in Pakistan (79% of cultivated area irrigated). Without this, land reform alone under-delivers.
  5. Complementary pieces: farm-to-market roads, storage/cold chain, crop insurance, and fair agri taxation.

Why the GDP needle can move

A simple way to size the GDP impact

Let s_{ag} be agri share of GDP (~0.235). If reform raises agri TFP/output by x% over ~10 years, direct GDP level gain ≈ s_{ag}\times x. With conservative spillovers/multipliers (agro-processing, textiles) of ~1.3–1.5, total effect is larger.

Why these ranges are plausible:

Pakistan-specific design checklist (practical)